Pages

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Singapore ties with Germany for most powerful passport in the world






Singapore is tied with Germany as the country with the most powerful passport.ST PHOTO: SEAH KWANG PENG

PUBLISHED
APR 19, 2017, 7:58 AM SGT


SINGAPORE - For the first time, Singapore is tied with Germany as the country with the most powerful passport in an international ranking.
Both Germany and Singapore now top the Global Passport Power Rank 2017, published by Arton Capital's Passport Index.
Holders of the Singapore passport can now get visa-on-arrival in Ukraine for up to 15 days, upping the Republic's score by one to 159, Arton Capital said in a press release on Tuesday (April 18).
Singapore was second before this change.
Germany still has the edge for visa-free free travel, it said. Germans can travel to 125 countries without a visa, holders of the Singapore passport, 122.
But Singapore beats Germany with a visa-on-arrival score of 37 to 34. The result - a tie.
"Singaporeans can rejoice that their passport offers them first-class global mobility," said Arton Capital.
The Passport Index compares the passports of 193 United Nations member countries and six territories.
Singapore was fourth this year in the Visa Restrictions Index, another ranking of travel freedom which uses a different way of calculating how "powerful" a passport is.
Germany also tops this table published by Henley & Partners. It has visa-free access to 176 countries out of a possible 218, according to this index.
The Visa Restrictions Index says Singapore passport holders enjoy visa-free access to 173 countries.
In both tables, Singapore is the highest-ranked Asian country.


A&W returning to Singapore: 5 things about the old-time fast food chain



A&W said that diners can expect to find stores in key neighbourhood towns or regions, as well as commercial malls and in the Central Business District.PHOTO: A&W RESTAURANTS/FACEBOOK

PUBLISHED
JUL 7, 2017, 11:40 AM SGT

Fabian Koh

SINGAPORE - Think A&W and you remember curly fries, coney dogs and root beer floats, for those of us who were around when the American fast-food restaurant had outlets all across Singapore.
The chain has announced that it will be returning to Singapore's shores next year, getting the little kid in all of us all excited and providing actual little kids with a gastronomic blast from the past.
Here are some things about the American fast-food chain's long history in Singapore:

1. IT WAS THE FAST FOOD-TRAILBLAZER IN SINGAPORE


A&W's first outlet in Singapore opened in Dunearn Road in 1966. It eventually had to make way for the widening of the Bukit Timah Canal. PHOTO: ST FILE 

When most Singaporeans think fast food, they think of outlets such as McDonald's and KFC.
But way before Ronald McDonald and Colonel Sanders touched down in Singapore in 1979 and 1977 respectively, A&W had arrived over a decade ago.
In 1966, American couple Al and Geri Lieboff brought the franchise here after introducing the brand to Malaysia, selling hamburgers, hot dogs and its signature root beer in Dunearn Road.
The location was near the former University of Singapore's Bukit Timah Campus and was a popular hangout for students to grab a bite and to go on dates at.
A&W later opened Singapore's first drive-in restaurant in Bukit Timah Road in 1970.
It went on to open many outlets, but had only five when it pulled out of Singapore in 2003 as it could not keep up with the competition and was suffering losses.

2. MORE THAN JUST LETTERS

The "A" and "W" in the name refer to the founders.
The chain originated in Lodi, California, when Roy W. Allen opened a root beer stand in June 1919.
The business took off and Allen partnered his employee Frank Wright. The two opened the first A&W restaurant in 1923 in Sacramento, California.
They put their initials together and the rest is fast-food history.

3. ABOUT THAT SIGNATURE ROOT BEER



The closest the young could get to ordering  Anchor and draught was settling for tangy  root "beer" on draught at A&W. PHOTO: ST FILE 

One of the chain's crowd favourites is the root beer float. The magical ingredient in this is the root beer.
A&W had gained popularity in America for its "frosty mugs", which were sort of like those used by some coffee shops selling beer in Singapore. The mugs were kept in a freezer until they were used to serve the beverage to customers.
The chain's root beer was concocted with a special recipe of a blend of herbs, spices, barks and berries.

3. THE BEAR WITH A STORY

The mascot of A&W is Rooty, also known as the Great American Root Bear.
He appears in the brand's advertisements both in print and online. He also appears in some YouTube videos and is the persona behind the company's Twitter account, with the account's description saying "Tweets from Spokesbear Rooty signed - RB".
Rooty made history in 2013 by becoming the first mascot to have an official LinkedIn account, but sadly that did not last long.
"Although they found Rooty's profile clever and funny, they ultimately shut it down because 'Rooty isn't real'. For all of us at A&W, Rooty is very much real and all of the recommendations and networking connections were done by someone real, not an autobot or generic response," said A&W's social & digital communications strategist Liz Bazner back then.

4. GOING ON STRIKE



Some of the 100 workers who staged a walkout over wage claims. They claimed that A&W management refused to implement the recommendations of the National Wages Council. PHOTO: ST FILE

A&W, the fast-food outlet which had brought countless people joy, was at the centre of grievances in 1973.
On Oct 8 that year, 100 workers from three outlets - in SIA Building in Robinson Road, Dunearn Road and Jurong - staged a walkout over wage claims.
They claimed the A&W management refused to implement the recommendations of the National Wages Council.
However, they returned to work the next day after the management agreed to meet them for negotiations.

5. WHERE TO GET IT IF YOU CANNOT WAIT


A&W, famous for its coney dogs and root beer floats, closed its last outlet in Singapore in Woodlands in 2003. PHOTO: BT FILE


For those of you who are super impatient and cannot wait for Rooty and company to swoop back into sunny Singapore, there are some things you can do.
If it is root beer you are craving, it is available off the shelves in supermarkets and shops.
Those who have tried it may or may not agree with me that the canned root beer just does not taste the same as the authentic version. Then again, beggars cannot be choosers.
If you are dedicated to the cause, make a trip across the causeway.
There are several A&W outlets, such as the one in Aeon Bukit Indah Shopping Centre in Johor Baru.
Or just hang in there. After all, good things come to those who wait.

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Singapore Airlines CEO indicates possible job cuts ahead: Bloomberg

(Updated: )




A photo taken on November 25, 2010 shows a Singapore Airlines Airbus A380. (Photo: AFP)

SINGAPORE: Singapore Airlines (SIA) may cut jobs as part of a business review after swinging to a surprise S$138 million net loss in its fourth quarter, a report cited CEO Goh Choon Phong as saying on Tuesday (Jun 6).

According to Bloomberg, Mr Goh said that the national carrier's staff are aware a reduction of headcount is possible under the review process.

Speaking at the annual meeting of the International Air Transport Association in Cancun, Mexico, Mr Goh added that some jobs in the group may become “irrelevant”, while some workers may need new skills for different tasks. However, he said it was too early to provide numbers.

Announcing its quarterly loss last month, the company had said that a wide-ranging review was under way. The review was aimed at "identifying new revenue-generation opportunities and reshaping the business into one that continues to deliver high-quality products and services, though with a significantly improved cost base and higher levels of efficiency", it had said.

The review process that covers the carrier’s fleet and network started more than six months ago, and SIA has hired external advisers for help, the Bloomberg report quoted Mr Goh as saying.

The SIA group, including its affiliates and units, employed an average of 24,350 workers at the end of March 2016, Bloomberg reported.

Source: CNA/mz

Singapore Airlines swings to S$138m net loss in Q4

(Updated: )




Singapore Airlines (SIA) on Thursday (May 18) reported a net loss of S$138 million in its fourth quarter from January to March, reversing from a S$225 million net profit in the same period last year.


SINGAPORE: Singapore Airlines (SIA) on Thursday (May 18) reported a net loss of S$138 million in its fourth quarter from January to March, reversing from a S$225 million net profit in the same period last year.

Fuel costs before hedging increased $331 million in the quarter, due to a 50.7 per cent surge in average fuel prices and a stronger US dollar against the Singapore dollar.

The company also said that passenger flown revenue fell $17 million despite a 5.5 per cent traffic growth.

"Intense competition continues to exert pressure on yields amidst persistent cost pressures," SIA said in a news release.

It also said that it made a provision for its cargo unit for "competition-related matters".

The national carrier said its operating profit for the 2016-2017 financial year was S$623 million, S$58 million lower than the same period last year.

Its full-year net profit fell by 55.2 per cent, attributable "in part" to the net loss recorded in the fourth quarter.

The S$138 million net loss is in stark contrast to the S$225 million net profit the group reported in the fourth quarter of the previous financial year.

For the full year, operating profit in its main SIA brand fell 20 per cent to S$386 million from the previous financial year.

However, profit increased 11 per cent in its SilkAir regional airline and also jumped by 59.52 per cent for its budget aviation holdings including low-cost subsidiaries, Tiger Airways and Scoot.

SIA Cargo posted an operating profit of S$3 million, up from a S$50 million loss the previous financial year.

Looking ahead, SIA said: "Intense competition arising from excess capacity in major markets, alongside geopolitical and economic uncertainty, continue to exert pressure on yields."

On a more upbeat note, it said that the many strategic initiatives implemented to address structural changes "are now showing positive results".

"Building on this foundation, the next phase of the SIA Group's transformation has been launched" with a wide-ranging review under way, the company said.

"The review is aimed at identifying new revenue-generation opportunities and reshaping the business into one that continues to deliver high-quality products and services, though with a significantly improved cost base and higher levels of efficiency."

Source: CNA/mz

Atelier De Lecture : Le Voyageur Sans Billet - Book & CD

Atelier De Lecture : Le Voyageur Sans Billet - Book & CD

 S$14.84
Free delivery worldwide
Available. Dispatched from the UK in 3 business days



















Product details
  • Mixed media product | 64 pages
  • 132 x 178 x 8mm | 40.82g
  • Didier
  • Paris, France
  • French
  • 2278073044
  • 9782278073047

https://www.amazon.fr/voyageur-sans-billet-livre/dp/2278073044

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Financial penalties imposed on Credit Suisse and UOB for 1MDB-related transactions: MAS



The logo of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is pictured at its building in Singapore. (Photo: REUTERS/Edgar Su/Files)

(Updated: )


SINGAPORE: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has imposed financial penalties on Credit Suisse and United Overseas Bank (UOB), and issued Prohibition Orders (POs) against three individuals and served notice of its intention to impose the same regulatory action on three others.

Its latest regulatory action comes as MAS announced in a media release on Tuesday (May 30) the completion of its two-year review of the banks involved in 1MDB-related transactions known to-date.

REGULATORY ACTIONS AGAINST CREDIT SUISSE AND UOB

The latest inspections of Credit Suisse and UOB revealed several breaches of anti-money laundering (AML) requirements and control lapses, MAS said.

They included weaknesses in conducting due diligence on customers and inadequate scrutiny of customers’ transactions and activities. MAS said it did not detect pervasive control weaknesses within these banks.

MAS imposed on Credit Suisse and UOB financial penalties amounting to S$700,000 and S$900,000, respectively, for breaches of MAS Notice 626 - Prevention of Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism.

It has directed the banks to appoint independent parties to assess and confirm to MAS that rectification measures have been effectively implemented. MAS has also instructed the management of Credit Suisse and UOB to take disciplinary measures, where appropriate, against errant staff.

The banks are currently taking measures to address the weaknesses identified and strengthen their AML controls, the media release added.

BANKS PLEDGE TO IMPROVE POLICIES, DONATE PROFITS TO CHARITY 

Both banks released press statements in response to the announcement on Tuesday morning, noting that MAS findings had found no pervasive anti-money laundering control weaknesses and accepting the central bank's findings.

Credit Suisse said it "takes a very serious view of our obligations in the prevention of money laundering and is firmly committed to upholding the high standards of the Singapore financial centre".

"We acknowledge the outcome of the review and regret that we have fallen short of the MAS’ and our own high standards. In recognition of the foregoing, Credit Suisse will donate all profits from the transactions in question to a worthy cause in support of our local community.

"Over the last few years, Credit Suisse has been investing in people and systems to strengthen its anti-money laundering processes and controls. The bank has co-operated fully with the MAS and taken further measures to address the issues identified in its review.”

In a separate statement, UOB said it "takes the importance of rigour in customer due diligence seriously".

The bank said it had instituted measures to address the areas of concern, including enhancing its training programme to raise risk and control awareness among its staff. Like Credit Suisse, UOB also said the profits associated with the lapses will be donated to charity.

"UOB will continue to build upon our anti-money laundering policies, processes and practices to strengthen the Bank’s ability to combat the threats posed by those seeking to abuse the banking system.

"We also expect our staff to uphold the highest ethical and professional standards in line with our code of conduct and will not condone behaviour that falls short of this."

PROHIBITION ORDERS AGAINST CONVICTED BANK EMPLOYEES

Further to its announcement on Mar 13, 2017, MAS also announced on Tuesday that it has issued lifetime POs against Mr Jens Fred Sturzenegger and Mr Yak Yew Chee, as well as a 15-year PO against Ms Seah Mei Ying with effect from May 29, 2017.

Mr Sturzenegger was the branch manager of Falcon Private Bank Ltd, Singapore branch (Falcon Bank), while Mr Yak and Ms Seah were employees of BSI Bank Limited (BSI Bank).

Mr Sturzenegger has been convicted of financial crimes including providing false information to authorities in an attempt to cover up his knowledge of Falcon Bank’s relationship with Mr Low Taek Jho.

Mr Yak and Ms Seah were convicted of multiple counts of failing to report suspicious transactions and of forging reference letters at BSI Bank on behalf of Mr Low.

All three individuals are prohibited from (i) providing any capital markets and financial advisory services; and (ii) taking part in the management of, acting as a director of, or becoming a substantial shareholder of any capital markets services or financial advisory firm in Singapore.

PROHIBITION ORDERS AGAINST KELVIN ANG AND OFFICERS OF NRA CAPITAL PTE LTD

MAS has served notice of its intention to issue a PO against Mr Ang Keng Wee Kelvin, a former representative of Maybank Kim Eng Securities (MKES). MAS also served notice of its intention to issue POs against the Chief Executive Officer of NRA Capital (NRA), Mr Kevin Scully, and its former Head of Research, Mr Lee Chee Waiy.

Through Mr Ang’s introduction, NRA was appointed to perform the valuation of PetroSaudi Oil Services Limited (PSOSL). On 24 May 2017, Mr Ang was convicted of an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act for bribing Mr Lee with S$3,000 to expedite the preparation of the valuation report on PSOSL.

MAS said Mr Lee had been the primary person in NRA working on the valuation. Apart from accepting the bribe, he was also found to have applied inappropriate methodology and assumptions in the valuation of PSOSL. As CEO of NRA, Mr Scully had failed to ensure that his analyst, Mr Lee, had exercised sufficient care, judgment and objectivity in the valuation of PSOSL, MAS added.

Commenting on the review, Ravi Menon, Managing Director of MAS said: “The two-year long 1MDB-related review holds key lessons for both MAS and financial institutions in Singapore. MAS has enhanced its AML surveillance and taken unprecedented enforcement actions against errant institutions and individuals.

"Financial institutions have increased their risk awareness and strengthened their AML controls. Our financial industry is in a better position today than it was when the abuses stemming from the 1MDB-related flows took place. The price for keeping our financial centre clean as it grows in size and inter-connectedness is unstinting vigilance,” he added.


Source: CNA/mn

Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/financial-penalties-imposed-on-credit-suisse-and-uob-for-1mdb-8894194

Friday, April 3, 2015

The Economist explains: Why golf is in decline in America




Golf traces its origins to 15th century Scotland but it was in America starting in the 1890s that it really came into its own. The country is by far the world’s biggest market for golf, home to about half its players and courses. Golf adds about $70 billion a year to America’s economy.

In 2006 some 30m Americans were golfers. But since then golf has hit a rough patch.

And it is now struggling to attract a new generation of American players.  In 2013, 160 of the country’s 14,600 golf facilities closed, the 8th consecutive year of net closures. The number of players has fallen to around 25m.

Why are fewer Americans playing golf? There are three main reasons.

First, golf’s calm pace may no longer fit in with modern lifestyles. It can take more than four hours to play a full round of 18 holes. And disappearing to the golf course for half the weekend is not compatible with modern attitudes to child-rearing.

Second, while golf may have managed to shake off some of its elitist image, America’s troubled economy is once more making it a pursuit of the wealthy. Middle and lower-income golfers have seen their pay packets shrink, hurting membership numbers at mid-range golf courses. Some public courses have been closed by local governments making spending cuts.  

Third, golf has become harder to play. Since the 1990s golf-course designers have taken to building longer, tougher courses in order to put golfers and their equipment to the test. The sport’s growing difficulty and its 200-page rulebook make it a tough sell to new players.

In the past stars have had the power to reignite interest in the game. Tiger Woods drew an unprecedented number of newcomers to the sport. But he fell from grace and no new star has emerged to take his place.

Instead, in a bid to renew golf’s appeal, faster, easier versions of the sport are being invented. Foot golf, a hybrid of football and golf and top golf, which involves hitting gold balls onto huge, coloured targets in outdoor sports bars, are two experiments.

Will they succeed in reviving the sports popularity? That, as a golfer would say, is a long shot.

Monday, July 28, 2014

Helicopter parents - Relax, your kids will be fine

Helicopter parents

Relax, your kids will be fine


IN 1693 the philosopher John Locke warned that children should not be given too much “unwholesome fruit” to eat. Three centuries later, misguided ideas about child-rearing are still rife. Many parents fret that their offspring will die unless ceaselessly watched. In America the law can be equally paranoid. In South Carolina this month Debra Harrell was jailed for letting her nine-year-old daughter play in a park unsupervised. The child, who had a mobile phone and had not been harmed in any way, was briefly taken into custody of the social services.

Ms Harrell’s draconian punishment reflects the rich world’s angst about parenting. By most objective measures, modern parents are far more conscientious than previous generations. Since 1965 labour-saving devices such as washing machines and ready meals have freed eight hours a week for the average American couple, but slightly more than all of that time has been swallowed up by childcare. Dads are far more hands-on than their fathers were, and working mothers spend more time nurturing their sprogs than the housewives of the 1960s did. This works for both sides: children need love and stimulation; and for the parents, reading to a child or playing ball games in the garden is more fulfilling than washing dishes.

There are two blots in this picture, connected to class. One is at the lower end. Even if poor parents spend more time with their children than they once did, they spend less than rich parents do—and they struggle to provide enough support, especially in the crucial early years (see article). America is a laggard here; its government spends abundantly on school-age kids but much less than other rich countries on the first two or three years of life. As this newspaper has pointed out before, if America did more to help poor parents with young children, it would yield huge returns.

The second problem, less easy to prove, occurs at the other end of the income scale, and may even apply to otherwise rational Economist readers: well-educated, rich parents try to do too much (see article). Safety is part of it: they fear that if they are not constantly vigilant their children may break their necks or eat a cupcake that has fallen on the floor. Over-coaching is another symptom. Parents fear that unless they drive their offspring to Mandarin classes, violin lessons and fencing practice six times a week, they will not get into the right university. The streets of Palo Alto and Chelsea are clogged with people-carriers hauling children from one educational event to another.

The fear about safety is the least rational. Despite the impression you get from watching crime dramas, children in rich countries are mind-bogglingly safe, so long as they look both ways before crossing the road. Kids in the 1950s—that golden era so often evoked by conservative politicians—were in fact five times likelier to die before the age of five. Yet their parents thought nothing of letting them roam free. In those days, most American children walked or biked to school; now barely 10% do, prevented by jittery parents. Children learn how to handle risks by taking a few, such as climbing trees or taking the train, even if that means scraped knees and seeing the occasional weirdo. Freedom is exhilarating. It also fosters self-reliance.

Get out of that helicopter
The other popular parental fear—that your children might not get into an Ivy League college—is more rational. Academic success matters more than ever before. But beyond a certain point, parenting makes less difference than many parents imagine. Studies in Minnesota and Sweden, for example, found that identical twins grew up equally intelligent whether they were raised together or apart. A study in Colorado found that children adopted and raised by brainy parents ended up no brainier than those adopted by average parents. Genes appear to matter more than upbringing in the jobs market, too. In a big study of Korean children adopted in America, those raised by the richest families grew up to earn no more than those adopted by the poorest families.
This does not mean that parenting is irrelevant. The families who adopt children are carefully screened, so they tend to be warm, capable and middle-class. But the twin and adoption studies indicate that any child given a loving home and adequate stimulation is likely to fulfil her potential. Put another way, better-off parents can afford to relax a bit. Your kids will be fine if you hover over them less and let them frolic in the sun from time to time. You may be happier, too, if you spend the extra time indulging your own hobbies—or sleeping. And if you are less stressed, your children will appreciate it, even if you still make them eat their fruit and vegetables.

Stressed parents - Cancel that violin class

Helicopter moms and dads will not harm their kids if they relax a bit




WELL-TO-DO parents fear two things: that their children will die in a freak accident, and that they will not get into Harvard. The first fear is wildly exaggerated. The second is not, but staying awake all night worrying about it will not help—and it will make you miserable.
Modern parents see risks that their own parents never considered. They put gates at the top of stairs, affix cushions to table corners and jam plastic guards into sockets to stop small fingers from getting electrocuted. Those guards are “potential choking hazards”, jests Lenore Skenazy, the author of “Free-Range Kids”. Ms Skenazy let her nine-year-old son ride the New York subway on his own. He was thrilled; but when she spoke about it on TV, a mob of worrywarts called her “America’s worst mom”.
Yet in fact American children are staggeringly safe. A kid under five in the 1950s was five times as likely to die (of disease, in an accident, etc) than the same kid today. The chance of a child being kidnapped and murdered by a stranger is a minuscule one in 1.5m.
What about academic success? Surely the possibility of getting into Harvard justifies any amount of driving junior from violin lesson to calculus tutor?
Bryan Caplan, an economist at George Mason University, says it does not. In “Selfish Reasons To Have More Kids”, he points to evidence that genes matter far more than parenting. A Minnesota study found that identical twins grow up to be similarly clever regardless of whether they are raised in the same household or in separate ones. Studies in Texas and Colorado found that children adopted by high-IQ families were no smarter than those adopted by average families. A Dutch study found that if you are smarter than 80% of the population, you should expect your identical twin raised in another home to be smarter than 76% but your adopted sibling to be average. Other twin and adopted studies find that genes have a huge influence on academic and financial success, while parenting has only a modest effect.
The crucial caveat is that adoptive parents have to pass stringent tests. So adoption studies typically compare nice middle-class homes with other nice middle-class homes; they tell you little about the effect of growing up in a poor or dysfunctional household.
The moral, for Mr Caplan, is that middle-class parents should relax a bit, cancel a violin class or two and let their kids play outside. “If your parenting style passes the laugh test, your kids will be fine,” he writes. He adds that if parents fretted less about each child, they might find it less daunting to have three instead of two. And that might make them happier in the long run. No 60-year-old ever wished for fewer grandchildren.
Does over-parenting hurt children? Probably not; but it exhausts parents. Hence the cascade of books with titles like “All Joy And No Fun” and “Go The F**k To Sleep”. Kids notice when their parents are overdoing it. Ellen Galinsky, a researcher, asked 1,000 kids what they would most like to change about their parents’ schedules. Few wanted more face time; the top wish was for mom and dad to be less tired and stressed.

Women in Saudi Arabia - Unshackling themselves

Saudi women are gaining ground, slowly





A RECENT move to introduce physical education to government girls’ schools met the same response as most attempts to give Saudi women equal rights with men. A group of conservatives protested in Riyadh, the capital, against “Westernising” moves that would lead to adultery and prostitution. Such mores, they argued, have no place in the birthplace of the Prophet Muhammad.
But sport looks set to become a fact of life for women in the kingdom. In 2012 two Saudi women took part in the Olympics for the first time, weathering a torrent of abuse. Since last year the authorities have been giving licences to private sports clubs for women, a far cry from 2006 when Lina al-Maeena had to register her ladies’ basketball team in Jeddah as a company. Even in stuffier Riyadh, girls can be seen kicking footballs with their brothers, the hems of their black abayas trailing in the dust.

Slowly the tide in Saudi Arabia appears to be running in women’s favour. “The Saudi woman’s voice has always been there calling for change,” says Hatoon al-Fassi, a prominent Saudi historian of women in Arabia. “But today it is more apparent and it is getting to the decision-makers.” Though lambasting the lack of equality between the sexes in the kingdom, Human Rights Watch, a New York-based lobby group, last year referred to “encouraging, modest” reforms for women.
Since taking power in 2005, King Abdullah, the ageing monarch, has given women a bigger role in public life. In 2009 Norah al-Faiz was appointed deputy minister for education, the highest post attained by a woman in government. Last year 30 women took their seats in the Shura Council, a consultative body of 150 members, also appointed by the king. And women are due for the first time to vote and stand in municipal elections—the only ones permitted in the kingdom—albeit that only half the seats are elected and that the councils are pretty toothless.
In the private arena changes are afoot, too. This year Somayya Jabarti became the first female editor of a daily newspaper, the Saudi Gazette. More women are working, including running their own businesses, though the female unemployment rate remains a lofty 32%. The first female-run law firm opened this year, after the authorities lifted a ban preventing women law graduates from practising.
And women are generally more visible, even on the streets of Riyadh, which lies in the heartland dominated by the influence of Wahhabists, who follow an ultra-conservative version of Islam. Since restrictions on women at work have been eased, they operate cash tills everywhere, from lingerie shops to IKEA, a Swedish-founded furniture shop. They take taxis alone and head to the increasing number of facilities dedicated to women, from spas to separate floors of shopping malls.
Women are speaking up, too. Princess Reema bint Bandar al-Saud, a great-granddaughter of the founding king, runs a franchise of Harvey Nichols in Riyadh—and led a team of women to the base camp of Mount Everest to raise awareness of breast cancer. Women have written the most acclaimed Saudi novel of recent years, “Girls of Riyadh”, and directed the first feature film made in the country, “Wadjda”, about a girl in Riyadh who dreams of owning a bicycle to race against a neighbouring boy.
Across the board, Saudi women are pushing for changes to laws in a country where sharialaw is imposed by all-male courts. Last year human-rights groups hailed new legislation to criminalise domestic violence, though who is in charge of enforcing it remains unclear. From 2020 identity cards will be mandatory rather than optional for women, who until 2001 were required simply to be listed on their male guardian’s card.
Dainty steps at a time
There is still a long way to go. The guardianship rule—under which women must get permission from their husband, father or, less commonly, brother or son, to travel, work or get medical treatment—remains in place, in effect treating half the adult population as minors. Yet women can be held criminally responsible.
“Until [the guardianship rule] goes, all the changes are just a show for outside,” says Aziza Yousef, a professor at Riyadh’s King Saud University. By not tackling the issues head on, some argue that Saudi Arabia is institutionalising segregation, whereby women are still not allowed to be alone with unrelated men in public. Banks have “ladies branches”. Education is single-sex from kindergarten through to doctorates; King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 80km (50 miles) north of Jeddah, is the sole exception. Even shopping for clothes, women suffer innumerable annoyances. If, for example, they want to try on a garment, they generally have to do so in a toilet, since male-manned shops do not offer changing rooms.
For every step forward, the kingdom appears to take one back. Last month the local media reported that a woman had been sentenced to 150 lashes and eight months in jail for the crime of driving a car. The kingdom still ranks 127th of 136 in the UN’s gender-gap index.
There is no sign of any rethinking of the Wahhabists’ interpretation of Islam and their grip on Saudi morals. The religious establishment, on which the House of Saud relies to sustain its autocratic rule, has embalmed many tribal customs as Islamic and enforces strict interpretations of the religion which are not shared by Muslims in other countries, nor indeed by many in Saudi Arabia.
Instead, change is coming in other ways. One is social media. Newspaper columnists such as Ms al-Fassi and Samar Fatany, a veteran journalist, have been joined by many others online. Eman al-Nafjan runs Saudiwoman’s Weblog, which tackles an array of women’s issues. Twitter is full of campaigns for (and against) women’s rights. Ms Yousef uploaded videos to YouTube of herself driving. Serene al-Feteih, a freelance writer and photographer, is just about to launch a chat show in which she and two other women will debate matters seldom aired before, from contentious aspects of divorce to why Islam permits one man to have four wives.
Clever clogs
Education is forging change, too. More women than men are now in higher education; women-only universities are popping up everywhere. At least 150,000 Saudi students, a large minority of them women, many of them without a chaperone, are studying abroad. “The young generation is being exposed to other cultures and ways of doing things,” says Haifa Jamal al-Lail, president of Effat University, a private college for women in Jeddah and the first to offer engineering courses to women.
More than anything, change is coming through economics. “Fewer men are happy to come home to their wife with her feet up,” says Khalid al-Khudair, founder of Glowork, a company that runs a website to connect women and employers. “And then they will get annoyed at having to drive her everywhere.” In a branch of a lingerie chain, Nayomi, one of the shops that must now have female staff only, four newly hired women discuss their jobs. “The attitudes of families and men are changing,” says Areej Yaseen. A colleague disagrees: “My father allows me to work only because we need the money,” she says.
Fatwas, such as one issued by Sheikh Saleh bin Saad al-Luhayan asserting that women would damage their ovaries if they were to drive a car, are the least of the obstacles. A range of other Saudis also resist change. The government is nervous of giving more power to any ordinary people, women included. Many in the clergy think likewise. Some men argue for change, but more simply want to keep women down. And many women themselves resist emancipation. A rare government poll (admittedly, back in 2006) found that 86% of women thought they should not work in a mixed environment; and 89% thought they should not be allowed to drive.
“The first women we got jobs for in a supermarket in Riyadh last year had to be sacked after a week—thanks to the public outcry,” says Mr Khudair. “But soon people got used to the idea.” His company finds jobs for women in call-centres, at home and part-time. And attitudes and practices shift naturally. When companies first employed women, they had separate buildings, entrances and areas to work. Now in many offices men and women mingle. “The law is unclear,” says a male businessman. “We take advantage of that.” Sahal Yaseen, an imam and family counsellor in Jeddah, says divorce is becoming more frequent as women become more assertive and aware of their rights.
Women disagree over how best to win more reforms, though most agree it is still happening too slowly. “Change is most likely to come by working within the system,” says Hoda Abdulrahman al-Helaissi, a Shura Council member. Those sharing her view argue that provocative gestures, such as driving, cause a backlash. They point to places such as Switzerland, where women got the vote only in 1971. “Change is happening rapidly here,” says Ms Helaissi. “It’s just several decades behind.”
Others argue that the country’s old and out-of-touch rulers need to move much faster. “No society changed without laws mandating it from the top,” says Ms Yousef. “People need pushing,” agrees Khaled al-Maeena, a veteran journalist who groomed Ms Jabarti for the editorship of the Saudi Gazette.
Where most Saudi women appear to agree is that their ultimate goal is not to copy Western women. Despite the globalising ways influencing the kingdom, they tend to see their identity as inextricably bound to their country’s as the home of Islam. Most want to abide by the Koran’s description of their role. Many agree that they should dress modestly. Others accept that a woman should ask her husband for permission to travel. Indeed, what Islam really says about women is still, in Saudi Arabia, waiting for a proper debate. Until that happens, change will continue. But slowly.